Lone-nut scenario implanted in Colorado shooting, Holmes convicted by media


In his initial court appearance, Holmes appeared to have no idea what was happening.

 

By Craig McKee

The official story is set within hours – sometimes even minutes.

We saw it with the Kennedy assassination(s), the Oklahoma City Bombing, 9/11, and many other proven conspiracies. Now we’re seeing it with the Colorado “Dark Knight” shooting that took place in an Aurora movie theatre on July 20.

Once the official narrative is set, it will rarely change substantially. New details will emerge but the initial story that we’ve been fed is locked in.

The official story of the shootings (in which 12 died and 58 were injured) is that 24-year-old neuroscience student James Holmes was mentally disturbed and acted alone. This is echoed in the media with few exceptions. Any information contradicting the official spin was, and continues to be, buried. Essential questions are not asked.

In the Colorado shooting, the media have focused on whether it was too easy for the suspect to get the weapons he allegedly used. They have questioned whether his psychiatrist told authorities of her concerns about Holmes’s mental state and whether she notified police. They have questioned whether the University of Colorado should have seen the potential for Holmes to commit a violent act and taken preventative action.

Despite early reports that the shooter may have had at least one accomplice, the media have stuck to the script, putting all their focus on questioning what would make an intelligent young university student become a killer. They take it as a given that he is the killer, just as the media has done with Lee Harvey Oswald for the past half century.

An ABC News report done minutes after the shooting set the stage by announcing that a “lone gunman” had been responsible. How did they know that? How could police tell them that so quickly? Interestingly, ABC anchor Rob Nelson, talking over live pictures from the Century 16 theatre, said: “This does fulfill a fear that we’ve all had as Americans, that we’ve reported on extensively at ABC News, and that is the proliferation of the lone wolf terrorist, and this could be an example of that.”

The report gets worse as Nelson then goes on to talk about the movie-goers as “soft targets”:

“If you think about airports, we know what the security is like there; we take off our shoes, we take off our belt and walk through those scanners, but we don’t do that on buses, we don’t do that on trains, in shopping malls, movie theatres and you have to wonder, once the dust settles, once we get past in initial shock of this, do we now begin a talk about security?” His co-anchor chirps in: “We’re so vulnerable.”

The push to impose an official version of this crime has come on two fronts. First, the authorities and the media dismiss any idea that the crime could have been a co-ordinated attack involving more than one shooter. Second, the media obediently report that Holmes is that one shooter. Major media reports not only don’t question whether others could have been involved, but they don’t allow Holmes a trial before deciding he is guilty. They don’t even acknowledge that there is no proof that he fired even one shot.

ABC News shamelessly and deliberately twisted the words of Holmes’s mother when she said, “You have the right person.” She meant that yes she is the mother of James Holmes. She didn’t even know the shooting had taken place at this point (ABC called her before 6 a.m.). They claimed she made this statement confirming that she wasn’t surprised to find that her son had shot up a movie theatre.

This was a blatant lie by ABC, which has mangled coverage of this story on so many levels. ABC also showed the 2006 video of James Holmes speaking at a science camp, labelling the footage: “first video of a killer.” The number of media reports – mainstream and otherwise – that simply call Holmes “the killer” are too numerous to list.

On the Colorado Public Television show Devil’s Advocate, University of Denver law professor David Kopel makes this incredible statement during a recent discussion of the shooting:

“The media’s actually hyper-scrupulous about calling the killer “the accused” or “the suspect.” That’s appropriate in about 99.9% of crime cases but here it’s absolutely certain he did this crime. There’s a question about whether he’s legally insane, but there’s no doubt… And yet because of media standards they still have this sort of Victorian sensibility about calling him the suspect.”

We don’t have to wait for a trial to pronounce someone “the killer” if we’re REALLY SURE he did it. And this guy teaches law. Well, if we can call Holmes a killer without needing a trial, why don’t we just lock him up for life without a trial, too? I mean, if we’re sure…

An ABC “virtual view” re-enactment was accompanied by this voice-over: “… a man in the front row got up, pretending to take a phone call. He went out the emergency exit, propping the door open behind him. Witnesses say he threw a green canister into the crowd, filling the theatre with smoke as if re-enacting a scene from a Dark Knight comic book. Witnesses say Holmes fired into the air and then started firing into the crowd.”

How do they know he was pretending to take a call? How would witnesses even know this? How does anyone know that the person who went out was the same person who came back in, dressed head to toe in full SWAT gear and gas mask? And how can witnesses say it was Holmes? No one ever saw Holmes in the theatre.

Then there’s witness Corbin Dates who has stated in great detail that a man with a goatee came in to theatre 9 and sat in the front, right row. He took a call on his phone and then walked to the emergency exit. He held the door open with his foot and gestured to someone outside.

Another unidentified witness calmly described in a TV interview (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dnl_25VSNvs) that it was clear the shooter wasn’t working alone.

“From what we saw he wasn’t alone because the second can of tear gas didn’t come from his side.”

Why are these witnesses not being listened to? Why is their version of the story being suppressed?

Have any of the mainstream media questioned how a second gas mask ended up on the ground a couple of hundred feet away from the emergency exit? Did Holmes run to the corner of the building, drop it, and then run back to the car, all the while wearing the other gas mask? Are there surveillance tapes that show who put the mask there? Are there tapes that show Holmes entering or leaving the theatre?

And what about the trial of blood that leads out of the theatre and trails off as it heads to the same corner of the building where the gas mask was found? We’ve been told that victim Allie Young was shot in the neck, the bullet severing an artery. With blood literally spurting from her neck, she was helped by her friend out the emergency exit.

Instead of going to the lobby where all the other victims were exiting, they used the same exit the shooter used, walking the length of the building until they reached a waiting rescue vehicle several hundred feet away. Why wouldn’t the vehicle come to them instead of parking some distance away?

President Obama visited Young in the hospital, and we saw that her wound appeared to be healing beautifully, without bandages, after just three days. I’m no doctor, but…

And has anyone explained how a neuroscience student with no military training or experience could booby-trap his apartment with explosives so sophisticated that police took two days to disarm them?

Was Holmes a patsy, a victim of mind control? Was he actually sitting in his car in a drugged state while the shooting was taking place, ready to be arrested when it was over? Was the back story of him buying “legal” weapons over the Internet true? Was the notebook allegedly sent by Holmes to his psychiatrist, Dr. Lynne Fenton (a former Air Force psychiatrist), really found in the post office after escaping detection for a week?

How can it be explained that an exercise at Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine that required students to respond to a mass shooting in a movie theatre was going on the very same day that the actual shooting took place? We saw the same pattern of impossible coincidences with 9/11, the London 7/7 bombings, and the mass killings last year in Norway.

And why haven’t we heard more about the drowning death of an emergency room nurse who treated victims of the Aurora shooting?

We can be sure the mainstream media will never explore the possibility that Holmes was a drugged, mind-controlled patsy who was set up to take the fall for this crime, although this scenario makes a lot more sense than what we’ve been told.

No one can say that in his court appearance, Holmes looks like someone who was in school just a couple of months ago. Something happened to this young man, and it seems to have happened relatively suddenly.

The whole “Manchurian Candidate” scenario may sound far-fetched to some, but lawyers for Sirhan Sirhan think it explains his role in the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy in 1968.

We now know for sure that this was a conspiracy involving more than one shooter (Kennedy was shot from behind while many witnesses place Sirhan in front of Kennedy at all times). Even today, 44 years after that killing, Sirhan’s lawyers are fighting for his release from prison, alleging that he was a victim of hypno-programming .

If something like this happened to James Holmes – if he was set up to take the fall for a mass killing that had a hidden purpose – let’s hope it doesn’t take another 44 years to expose it.

75 thoughts on “Lone-nut scenario implanted in Colorado shooting, Holmes convicted by media

  1. Last week, I finished “Columbine” by Dave Cullen who spent ten years writing and researching this book.

    In 1999, two kids tried to blow up their school and leave “a lasting impression on the world.” Their bombs failed, but the ensuing shooting defined a new era of school violence-irrevocably branding every subsequent shooting “another Columbine.”

    It is a story that the media got wrong – thus all of us got it wrong. “Columbine” is an excellent work of media criticism ~ it sheds light on how legends become truths through continual repetition.

  2. As stated in my 911grassroots.org article right after the event: due to lack of any sufficient motive for such an atrocity by the suspect, lacking any prior record, and with a mega-connected father set to testify the next day in the British banking scandal (some coincidence!), my suspicion is MK-Ultra, same as with many recent other incidences. That, of course, doesn’t exclude there being an accomplice.

  3. Another excellent job Craig. One little update though, out of respect to being 100% accurate with details as they unfold. Take this for what you will, it certainly doesn’t debunk the conspiracy, but in the interest of full disclosure, I received an email from Citizens for Legitimate Government about a month ago. Here is what it said:

    Correction: Monday’s CLG Newsletter lead included the following headline, ‘Aurora Shooting Mirrored Training Exercise on Same Day Near Denver.’ I linked to a summary of a 21 July article, ‘Real life shooting imitates training exercise at Parker medical school,’ written by Nancy Lofholm of The Denver Post. The first sentence of the article read, “The tragedy that played out in an Aurora movie theater Friday was ironically paralleled as a classroom learning experience in a medical school in Parker the same day.” Ms. Lofholm kindly informed me of the following correction: “The movie-shooting exercise didn’t happen until the day after the shooting. The school was using three scenarios and that was one of them.” The exercises were “on-going” and took place Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. They were part of two weeks of general disaster training. I want to express my thanks to Ms. Lofholm for this info! I am passing this correction along to CLG readers with my apologies for implying that the Aurora shooting exercise took place on the same day that the theater incident was unfolding, when, in fact, that particular training exercise transpired after the shooting, on Saturday. –LRP 23 Jul 2012.

    Still, the fact that the exercises were “ongoing” during that same time is suspicious.

  4. There are tons of things we can discuss that connect to the idea of media imprinting a false message on the public. Topics not allowed on this thread: NPT, video fakery, holograms, and physics in general. If anyone wants to continue discussion of these on the previous post, then do so but please do not transfer it here.

  5. In the wake of the remarkable censorship of the self-evident terrorist controlled demolition of the twin towers under evacuation and of their transparent cover-up, clues that the Aurora shooting would be a set-up are not amazing, are they?

    Love,

  6. A few weeks ago, I noticed another discrepancy about the Colorado Shooting Case that I’ve NOT heard discussed anywhere else:

    Jewish Big Brothers Big Sisters of Los Angeles supposedly confirmed that Holmes was a cabin counselor, responsible for 10 children at its Camp Max Straus for children ages 7 to 14 from Los Angeles. Holmes was then a 20-year-old student at the University of California, Riverside, and neighbors have said he was active in the PRESBYTERIAN Church that the family attended. The camp is nonsectarian.

    However, FAQ #1 on their website states “Volunteers must be 21 and Jewish”. Holmes was neither. http://www.jbbbsla.org

    Questions that should follow are:

    -Who authorized the exception to the age and faith requirement in his application, and why?

    -Were all the Jewish parents of those 10 children who paid for their kids to attend a Jewish Camp made aware of this exception?

    -Is there other corroboration that Holmes was indeed a camp counselor at that time?

    -Can those 10 children he supervised confirm Holmes was their counselor?

    -Did he maintain correspondence with anyone outside of the camp during that time?

    Makes me wonder if the time he was supposedly a camp counselor was instead a cover and a doorway into his MK Ultra sessions.

  7. Craig McKee says: “There are tons of things we can discuss that connect to the idea of media imprinting a false message on the public. Topics not allowed on this thread: NPT, video fakery, holograms, and physics in general. If anyone wants to continue discussion of these on the previous post, then do so but please do not transfer it here.”

    But what if someone believes that video fakery and actors might have been used by the media in this specific instance to imprint that “false message on the public” , and can show specific examples, Craig?

    And what if the actual physics of the event [lets say, applied to firearms /ballistics of weapons used] defies media reports?

    Regards, onebornfree.

    • My point is that I don’t want this thread to be the same as other threads that have looked at these issues over and over. We all know where you and others stand on NPT, video fakery, etc. Yes, obviously this is related to media manipulation, but I’m saying that I want to look other aspects of how media implant messages – you don’t need fake images to fool people with a bogus official story. I want us to look at some of the broader issues – as well as any aspect of the Colorado shooting itself. If you want to discuss subjects that have already been thoroughly covered, you can do that by continuing those discussions where they are now.

  8. Craig,

    Great article as usual my friend. My thoughts about this are that Holmes is indeed a patsy under some form of hypno programming and possibly drugs as well. My impression is that Holmes was set up ala the film “Shooter” which we discussed in the last thread. I personally doubt he did any shooting himself but of course we will never know that for a fact even if it is true. As to hypno programming I have something very important to add to that hypothesis. The following video by mentalist Derren Brown illustrates an ordinary man being hypnotised and turned into an assassin. In addition to turning the man into an assassin Derren uses hypnosis to make him a much more accurate shooter AND most importantly he illustrates how the memory of the assassination is wiped from the mans memory completely. I was stunned when I watched this.

    Correct me if I am wrong but after watching this I think you will agree that Derren just showed us exactly how these “lone gunman” are manufactured. This is a look behind a very dark curtain and I suspect Derren wants all of us to know what is really going on.

    Incidentally Derren Brown is an excellent person to research if you are interested in how psyops are done, how mind control works, how to manipulate people, and how to fool people into believing things that are not true. I have all his videos which are extensive and he is simply amazing. He may well be the worlds greatest mentalist.

  9. Well written, Craig. Thanks for explaining “You’ve got the right person” statement made by his mother. It had never made any sense to me. How come he still looked drugged after being in police custody for a week? I’m surprised the MSM told us that Holmes had warned police that his apartment was booby trapped. And what about his father being scheduled to testify against bankers?

    • I didn’t get into the whys of this subject in this article but I will in another. The father’s involvement with the banking industry is very interesting and in need to investigation. There is also, of course, the gun control angle.

  10. It is suspicious, and I was unaware of these things previously. Thanks for filling me in . . . But the main question, of course, is why? Why stage this thing and frame him? I’m open to speculation, but I have no clue, personally, what the motivation would be.

    I did hear something at work concerning doubt over the bombs/traps/whatever at his house being made by him, but I dismissed it. They – the guy at work – allege that this would be done as an excuse to limit gun control . . . a conspiracy those I work with are constantly on the look-out for, but I put little, if any, credit to, ever. (Why would the country with the biggest military in the world be afraid of disorganized hicks with guns?) At any rate, again, why – what other reasons – would there be to do this?

    Thanks again

    • But the main question, of course, is why? Why stage this thing and frame him? I’m open to speculation, but I have no clue, personally, what the motivation would be.

      As quoted in the article:

      “If you think about airports, we know what the security is like there; we take off our shoes, we take off our belt and walk through those scanners, but we don’t do that on buses, we don’t do that on trains, in shopping malls, movie theatres and you have to wonder, once the dust settles, once we get past in initial shock of this, do we now begin a talk about security?” His co-anchor chirps in: “We’re so vulnerable.”

      It’s to remind us that we NEED all these body scanners, metal detectors, police checkpoints… government there to protect us. And the people, even protesters, accept it.

      When the “Occupy” movement really picked up steam back in 2011, and started becoming a serious threat to the establishment, the PTB got out the riot police in full force. When the PTB said, “Okay, protesters, you’ve had your fifteen minutes, now you’re disrupting the normal orderly flow of society and business… cease and disperse, or go where you’re not as easily seen!” Guess what the vast majority of protesters did? Wishing to make their political statement (which they had done), but not wishing to get tazed, pepper sprayed, or spend a night or three in jail, many of them simply tucked tail between legs and obediently did what the police told them. As much as I believe in non-violent revolution, people need to understand that even with peaceful revolution, the PTB don’t want a revolution at all, so there will have, unfortunately, to be a few Kent State victims, a few Rachel Corries, before mass sentiment gets overwhelmingly angry against the status quo to the point where change in our favor is inevitable.

      And to make matters worse, you have people on the progressive “left” who are just as clueless as the Fox News dittoheads. Several months ago, during the Occupy peak, I shared a photo on Facebook that showed a bunch of riot police, and it said, “To find out who’s looking for a riot, look who comes dressed for a riot.” A musical colleague of mine basically responded with words to the effect of: “Now Adam, come on… not everything is a conspiracy, and the govt isn’t out to get you. There are truly some extremely unruly and hooliganistic members of society and they need to be kept in check…” VOMIT!!!! She then cited, as her evidence, some unruly drunk people in Clifton one Saturday nite in Cincy, which kept the neighborhood up. As she only gets her world view from CNN, PBS and NPR, she still operates under the paradigm that the real threat to humanity are the street level criminals, those shady people in the dark alleys in Over-the-Rhine, and that those riot police are our friends who are there to protect us.

      God help America.

  11. Craig McKee says” Yes, obviously this is related to media manipulation, but I’m saying that I want to look other aspects of how media implant messages – you don’t need fake images to fool people with a bogus official story. I want us to look at some of the broader issues – as well as any aspect of the Colorado shooting itself. If you want to discuss subjects that have already been thoroughly covered, you can do that by continuing those discussions where they are now.”

    I can only see 3 ways the media lie to us [i.e the broad issue]:

    1] The printed word

    2] Still photographs [usually backed up with printed word commentary]

    3] Verbal commentary with little or no visual back up [radio and TV]

    4] Video [backed up with verbal commentary on TV, and in the case of the internet, by printed words as well].

    Are you saying that should any be discovered, evidence of still photography fakery, and of video photography fakery specific to this case [i.e a full 50% of the possible ways that the media lies to us, and which effectively, as most people "swallow" the imagery they are fed almost without question, has a far greater than 50% power of persuasion impact over people, maybe as high as 80-90% of the "persuasion equation"] , will not be allowed to be discussed in this thread [ leaving only verbal and printed word media lies to be discussed] , and that all such still picture and video fakery discoveries, should they occur, must not be posted in this thread?

    Just trying to “get clear” here.

    regards onebonfree.

  12. Sherif Shaalan says: “Jim Stone, who writes reports under his site: http://www.jimstonefreelance.com, has come forward with some interesting allegations about the Aurora Shooting, in a new report, entitled: “All The Evidence Behind Why I Believe No One Died At The Theater”.”

    Thanks, very interesting link that shows parallels with what may well be the case with 9/11 [i.e. no, or very few, real victims] :
    http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=482&sid=70e5e04333f59040f753fb777c91b694

    regards, onebornfree.

    • This article was written to confuse people and discredit the fact that there were no jetliner attacks on 9/11. I was working on the 27th floor on the north side of the north Tower on 9/11. I can tell you for a fact that a plane never hit our building that day. You can search April Gallop on youtube, and she’ll tell you nothing hit the Pentagon that morning. There was an explosion, and she was lucky to escape with her infant son. It’s for sure nothing was in that small hole in Shanksville, and it’s a safe bet that the south Tower wasn’t hit by a plane either. Special effects belong in the movies and not on the six o’clock news. I can name six friends who lost their lives. It’s for sure none of the jumpers survived as well as those trapped on the upper floors.

      http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=482&sid=70e5e04333f59040f753fb777c91b694

      • Umn…Salt,

        This has nothing to do with the topic of this thread. But, this conflicts with what you said on another thread here some time back. I can retrieve the comments from that older thread where you claim to have been at an entirely different location on that morning.

        Shall I go to the trouble to do that, or will you stay on topic here and leave this video fakery BS for another thread?

        \\][//

        • I’m not the one who brought the article to this thread. I was exactly where I said I was on 9/11, and I have witnesses. You must have me mistaken for someone else.

      • Robert E. Salt says, June 8, 2012 at 8:43 am:
        “I agree that at least 98% of the Towers had turned to dust including the steel. Looking north to Manhattan from 5 miles away at 10:30AM, I could see a thick black cloud extending from NJ to Brooklyn about 4 miles wide. It was roughly 800 feet high. I knew the south Tower was already gone, and I was trying to see if the north Tower was still there. I couldn’t see it, but I wasn’t sure it wasn’t there because of the haze and smoke above the black cloud.”
        . . . . . . . . . . .

        The question that arises is; how did you get 5 miles away by 10:30AM, when the streets were jammed with people trying to get out of the area and responders trying to get into the area?

        I have witnesses to where I was on 9/11 as well. Just how would you propose we are to check out such witnesses?

        I don’t really care about this however – what I don’t want is this thread being hijacked by NPT, and video fakery again. So let this be the end of it.

        \\][//

  13. @ Craig McKee:

    I said: “I can only see 3 ways the media lie to us [i.e the broad issue]: ” , and then,[ of course!] I gave you 4 ways [ duh!] .

    Sorry ’bout that Craig – that’s what comes from multi-tasking [eating lunch and writing at the same time] I guess.

    Regards, onebornfree

  14. The Strategy of Tension – MKUltra – Domestic Psyops.

    The “Dark Knight” shootings have all the hallmarks of this.

    These things transpire to instill ‘fear and loathing’ and anxiousness in a population. It is as simple as Machiavelli’s advice in THE PRINCE.

    We covered this pretty deeply at my blog. I have some interesting items to bring here from there, and will do so in the next few hours.

    I have sitting here in front of me, BATMAN: THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS, the original graphic novel by Frank Miller ©1986. Therein on page 33 {does that number strike any chords?} on this page is a vignette about Arnold Crump who thinking about Led Zeppelin, who ‘Father Don’ had explained hid a prayer to Satan in their song ‘Stairway to Heaven’ by recording it backwards [backward masking - this is called]…Crump is thinking about this as he walks into a “Batman inspired porn movie theater” where Crump pulls out a gun and starts shooting people…

    The question arises; Who was Holmes’ ‘Father Don’?

    \\][//

  15. I was excited that we might have a fresh posting that would exclude the tedious jabberwakky that has fragged all of the rest…

    But alas, ’tis not to be.

    I had a lot of interesting items to post on this too…

    Whatever.

    \\][//

  16. This particular false flag was done, in my opinion and in the opinion of many others, to promote the gun control agenda. It happened just prior to the UN small arms treaty which was going to be approved but in the end failed. The reaction to the shooting was not what was intended by the real perps. The real intention was to rally public support for gun control but the actual effect was that gun sales surged.

    A serious question we need to ask about this is where did Holmes get the money to buy all these guns, equipment, ammo, and explosives? Did pops give it to him or did he steal it? Seriously where did he get the money because this was very expensive equipment he supposedly had.

    • Those who have seen Conspiracy Theory will understand it when I say that it is my opinion that Holmes was out – in a deep stupor – having been shot up with”gravy”.

      He was put into his car in the condition after being conditioned and an undisclosed location.

      Adam R has an excellent point about the money involved…as always follow the money.

      I would flip the question of gun control around. It is my view that while building this strategy of tension that what the elites really want is for the population to divide itself into heavily armed camps.

      They are no ignorant of the fact that every time there is an incident such as this weapons sales soar. This is a ‘Brier Rabbit’ ploy: “Pleeeeeaaase don’t throw me in that brier patch.” The powers that be WANT MAYHEM. They are doing their best to put the people in desperate straits and ready to riot.

      Reverse Psychology in practice.

      \\][//

    • I don’t know the sources for these statements, but according to this article http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/366700/20120725/james-holmes-aurora-theater-shooting-national-institute.htm
      Holmes was the recipient of a $26,000 grant from the NIH.

      Also,this recent documentary on James Holmes says (at 12:30) he received a “government grant” in July 2011 of $21,600.

      Neither one of these may be absolutely accurate, but they do present the possibility he had received a significant payment from some sort of scholarship grant.

      • Hadmatter,

        Yes I looked into this, he did indeed receive a special government scholarship grant. But such a grant is not available as a cash payout to the recipient.

        James Holmes received 65K grant from Bethesda based National Institutes of Health. One of only six chosen each year.

        http://deadlinelive.info/2012/07/25/exclusive-james-holmes-mentor-admits-to-mind-manipulation/

        John Jacobson, the person James Holmes named as his “mentor” during his science camp presentation on “temporal illusions” and “subjective experience” [1], can be seen in a video discussing the manipulation of a subject’s order of time perception. [2]

        At 1.58 in Jacobson says:
        “… it’s possible… for us to manipulate temporal order, we have loads of power over temporal order, if events happen in the order A/B, a good psycho-physicist can have the subject experience it as B/A, this is routine…”

        John Jacobson now completely denies being James Holmes’ ”mentor”, in fact he outright attacks every aspect of James Holmes life [4], from Holmes’ ability to do Flash programming as an intern (who would even dream that Flash programming abilities would be grounds to condemn the academic career of an honors graduate and prestigious grant winner [5] ), to claiming Holmes’ didn’t seem to understand “any of the basic science” [6], to claiming Holmes “just had no interest” in a high school girl Jacobson introduced. [4]”

        \\][//

  17. I don’t know if anyone else here heard them, but someone recorded the police dispatcher that night while the thing erupted at the theater.

    It is fascinating and rather exciting to be in on at least the audio of the incident.

    There you will find that there are several perps involved…a lot of chaos and confusion among the cops and first responders…and anyone speaking to “fake victims” is off in fantasy land.

    The medics were freaking, as they had so many wounded, badly wounded, and somehow the ambulances ended up going to the staging area for the “exercise” to take place the next day. So they had to load the wounded into police cars – really screwing up the protocol for setting up an enforced perimeter.

    All of this is in that audio___IF it hasn’t been scrubbed from the web by now.

    I’ll see if I can pick up the URL at my home site later.

    \\][//

  18. Craig McKee said: ” Major media reports not only don’t question whether others could have been involved, but they don’t allow Holmes a trial before deciding he is guilty. They don’t even acknowledge that there is no proof that he fired even one shot…..”

    Here is todays NYT [you know, "the paper of record"] pre-trial “conviction” of Holmes in all it’s ugly glory:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/27/us/before-gunfire-in-colorado-theater-hints-of-bad-news-about-james-holmes.html?pagewanted=all

    Unfortunately there are [as always] , “lone nut ” style pictures that accompany/reinforce the text of this particular pre-trial conviction, but it seems that discussion of visual imagery of this particular incident is somehow verboten here. :-) [Such is life., sigh.]

    Regards, onebornfree.

    regards, onebornfree.

    • Unbelievable. Does no one care about the presumption of innocence anymore? This is one of the worst examples I’ve seen yet.

      From the article: “…Mr. Holmes, encased in armor, his hair tinted orange, a gas mask obscuring his face, stepped through the emergency exit of a sold-out movie theater here and opened fire.”

      • Craig says:

        “Unbelievable. Does no one care about the presumption of innocence anymore?”

        We are definitely in the neomodern era of “Pre-Crime”, the public is being conditioned to expect presumption of guilt – a medieval and barbaric pre-Magna Carta concept. Out the window with Habeus Corpus, Presidential murder by drone diktat…etc.

        All of this is ‘predicted’ or predicated on the agenda {who’s name cannot be spoken}…the utter draconia of ‘Might is Right’.

        \\][//

  19. AURORA — The following is a timeline of actual events that took place just after the mass shooting was reported to 911 in a Colorado theatre during a midnight showing of the new Batman film:

    4 MIN. 30 SEC… SUSPECT CAUGHT

    6 MIN 46 SEC… “One of the shooters is wearing white and blue clothing”

    8 MIN 6 SEC… WITNESSES REPORT MULTIPLE SUSPECTS

    16 MIN 8 SEC… MALE SUSPECT SEEN WITH RED BACK PACK AND ANOTHER ALL IN BLACK FLEEING THE SCENE

    16 MIN. 47 SEC… Cops describe one of the suspects as male, dressed in black camo, vest, gas mask, and possessing multiple long guns.

    17 MIN 48 SEC… JAMES HOLMES WAS NAMED…. BUT SECONDS BEFORE THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT A SECOND SUSPECT ON LOOSE…. GOT AWAY”

    Recording of police broadcasts – dialog between dispatcher police in the field.

    Also See:

    http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2012/07/22/aurora-massacre-what-does-the-location-of-the-gas-mask-tell-us-what-about-security-cameras-are-they-related/

    \\][//

  20. The way James Holmes calmly gave himself up after allegedly doing the deed reminds me very much of Mark Chapman shooting Lennon and then calmly sitting down and reading Catcher in the Rye.

  21. This “Black Assassins” article makes some very plausible links that seem to show that the Dark Knight hit and the Temple hit are connected to the same active team…and have links going back as far as the Trenchcoat Mafia thing at Columbine, and further…a dense article, with a lot of historical background on MK, even to Mengele:

    http://mindcontrolblackassassins.com/2012/08/18/the-rise-of-the-knight-of-the-black-sun-wade-michael-page-the-joker-colorado-badlands-columbine-psyops/

    “On the morning of August 8th, the day after her body was reportedly discovered, the Dickson County Sheriff’s office issued a press release identifying Gallagher as the victim (although they misspelled her name) and providing a few additional details. It read (cache): Victim identified in West Okoboji drowning Published on Wednesday, 08 August 2012 06:30 On Tuesday, August 7, the Dickinson County Sheriff’s Office responded to a drowning on West Lake Okoboji. An investigation found that Jennifer Galagher, age 46, from Denver, Colorado, had been swimming the previous night in West Lake. On Tuesday morning, Galagher was reported missing by family. A short time later, a family member located Galagher underneath a nearby dock. Medical personnel responded and she was pronounced dead at the scene. Assisting the DCSO were: Milford Fire/Rescue Arnolds Park/Okoboji Dive Team Lakes Regional Healthcare Ambulance”

    None of this makes any sense. Jenny supposedly went out on a boat “with a friend” after her son and husband went to bed. Well, who and where is this “friend”…if someone was with her, why didn’t they alert the husband as soon as the “accident” happened? This “friend” has no published name as far as I can determine.

    None of this adds up, unless it is considered a hit – a silencing of someone who knew too much.

    \\][//

  22. Please don’t forget to look into the important role James Holmes’ father played and is playing in the FICOR and LIBOR scandals. He was involved in some very inconvenient dealings for global banks that are incredibly coincidental. Thank you.

  23. You can’t believe the government on anything. And you especially can’t believe them when they’re talking about important stuff.~Gary Webb, 8/31/55 – 12/10/04:

    Webb was a suicide victim from two fatal gunshots to the head. Webb was a journalist who produced a series of articles for the San Jose Mercury newspaper, on CIA drug running that went national viral.

    He was investigating the Inslaw case when he was suicided.

    This is the sort of thing that puts the ‘freeze’ in honest journalism, plus citizens who might speak out on ‘certain things’, like Nurse Galagher. Silencing her, results in silencing any of her co-workers who may have a clue to what she knew.

    \\][//

    • That “freeze” can last a lifetime, (as exemplified by Neil Armstrong in my opinion). Always very difficult to prove its origin, and impossible to criminally prosecute anyway, “suiciding” (or meeting with another planned, abrupt and permanent fate) has proven the most effective and most widely used silencer – exploiting fear, and the basic human survival instinct, to the benefit of those above the law.

      I think of Gus Grissom, something about being upset about 20,000 test failures. Consequently, Neil probably didn’t want to be NASA’s next toaster pastry.

      http://library.thinkquest.org/J0110163/gus_grissom.htm

  24. “Defense: Colo. shooting suspect tried to call university psychiatrist 9 minutes before attack 30 Aug 2012 The suspect in the Colorado shooting rampage tried unsuccessfully to call his university psychiatrist 9 minutes before he opened fire during a Batman movie premiere, defense attorneys revealed in court Thursday. James Holmes placed the call to an after-hours number at a hospital at the University of Colorado, Anschutz campus, where psychiatrist Lynne Fenton could be reached, defense attorney Tamara Brady said. It wasn’t clear why he called Fenton, and she wasn’t immediately available to talk to him. [See: Aurora, Colorado Shooting 'Oddities' By Lori Price.]”

    I am positing that Holmes was out at this time and this was a faked phone call by the real perps.

    \\][//

  25. DENVER (Reuters) – The University of Iowa denied accused Colorado gunman James Holmes admission into a neuroscience graduate program despite stellar test results, with a key faculty member writing, “do NOT offer admission under any circumstances,” documents showed on Thursday.
    ………….
    Do NOT offer admission under any circumstances seems a bit emphatic for someone unless advised through the mind control engineering department that this academic or military subject is in a special course of training.

    \\][//

  26. Kevin,
    This has got absolutely nothing to do with the article but it is something that I want to share with you. If you don’t post it that doesn’t matter I just want you to have it.
    It is the closing comments of a youtube video which I have copied because I liked them so much.
    Thanks Kevin.

    http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=55644

    Christians

    Our faith has been falsely claimed by those who have shown obvious contempt for its principles.

    To believe that G.W Bush is a follower of Christ is patently absurd. That Tony Blair could even associate himself with Jesus is contradicted by the deaths of innocent millions, many of them infants.

    That the vast majority of our church leaders do and say nothing in objection to British Foreign Policy is either indicative of inexcusable ignorance or tacit agreement with the genocides in Iraq & Afghanistan. It is suggested that each and every one of you reflect deeply upon your position given we are all answerable to God alone – not government.

    We urge you to petition your local police force to investigate.

    Muslims

    You are owed an apology for the intellectual paralysis of those in the Christian faith, for the demonisation of your people and for the murders of your brothers and sisters by those purporting to believe in God, regardless of our theological differences. You are invited to research the evidences shown in this film and the myriad other anomalies inherent within the official 9/11 & 7/7 narratives.

    Again, it is imperative you petition your local Police to investigate before you are wrongly blamed again.

    Other Faiths, Agnostics, Atheists, Skeptics, Cynics…

    You are not asked to take our word for everything you have seen amongst this very small fraction of the evidences contradicting the official events of 9/11 & 7/7. You are respectfully requested to research these issues and follow the evidence wherever it may lead, no matter how uncomfortable the conclusion to be drawn.

    If, in your intellectual pride, you still believe WTC 7 was brought down by fire (as you are told to believe) you may also be interested in some ‘Elvis Presley Live’ tickets we have available.

    The British Police

    Your organization is corrupt at the highest levels and hamstrung by cowardice throughout. The attitude of street coppers towards those of us who dissent is breath-taking in its arrogance, willful ignorance and naiveté. The apparent satisfaction to act as little more than personal shields for the proven criminals in UK Government and your failure to investigate the overwhelming evidences that contradict the government narrative of 9/11 and 7/7 is not only a betrayal of your oath to protect the public, but a failure to secure the well-being and good reputation of your own colleagues.

    We especially urge our Police to review the Channel 4 Documentary ‘Murder in St James’ in the hope the death of WPC Yvonne Fletcher (it could have been anyone of you) is properly analysed and her killers (regardless of how powerful they may be) are arrested and tried for murder.

    You are urged to open your minds and do your job.

    Our Armed Forces

    Please consider who your real enemies are, please research the effects of Depleted Uranium.

    All Politicians (With very few exceptions)

    You are an affront to humanity, the personification of cowardice, weakness and greed. You will be dealt with when critical mass has been achieved.

    Our Press
    Shameful

    Our Courts
    1 British Jury has already spoken volumes.

      • Craig
        I’m terribly sorry I meant you but I called you Kevin.
        Thanks for posting my comment, the movie has a lot of live video footage of some stuff that I believe to be quite rare…almost buried down the memory hole.

        I think Tony Farrell is a fine upstanding gentleman, His case would be a great topic for you to cover.
        Regards
        Socrates.

      • Cheers Craig.

        The last compilation was all over the place. This one narrows the lists down and makes them more readable.

        I knew Legge was full of it when I saw his figures. Thank you Frank for focusing my energy in one direction.

        Again, apologies for the off topic post Kevin…errr…Craig ;)

      • I’ve been banned at 911oz for posting this information

        You have been banned for the following reason:
        I am tired, you were banned years ago how did you get back on?

        Date the ban will be lifted: Never

        That’s a lie for a start. I posted over there a few weeks back exposing the owner of 911oz and John Bursill as being lying hypocritical shills for the Pentagon OCT (and posted links to it here) and turning a blind eye to the same group of people giving the same shoddy treatment to CD.

        “I am tired”….yes, of getting your ass owned Hereward. Tool.

  27. Back on topic, here’s an example of Derren Brown (the guy Adam R mentioned earlier)

    The argument can be made that these “lone nuts” could also have been targeted and nurtured over a much shorter time period than we think. Especially if drugs and/or more extreme forms of psychological “jolting” and compartmentalization are used.

    This guy Holmes looked absolutely frazzled in his courtroom appearance. How the hell could this guy carry out a military precision op when he was allegedly suffering a psychotic break?

  28. Reblogged this on USA COINTELPRO VICTIM OF THE PATRIOT ACT and commented:
    “If you think about airports, we know what the security is like there; we take off our shoes, we take off our belt and walk through those scanners, but we don’t do that on buses, we don’t do that on trains, in shopping malls, movie theatres and you have to wonder, once the dust settles, once we get past in initial shock of this, do we now begin a talk about security?” His co-anchor chirps in: “We’re so vulnerable.”

    The push to impose an official version of this crime has come on two fronts. First, the authorities and the media dismiss any idea that the crime could have been a co-ordinated attack involving more than one shooter. Second, the media obediently report that Holmes is that one shooter. Major media reports not only don’t question whether others could have been involved, but they don’t allow Holmes a trial before deciding he is guilty. They don’t even acknowledge that there is no proof that he fired even one shot.

    ABC News shamelessly and deliberately twisted the words of Holmes’s mother when she said, “You have the right person.” She meant that yes she is the mother of James Holmes. She didn’t even know the shooting had taken place at this point (ABC called her before 6 a.m.). They claimed she made this statement confirming that she wasn’t surprised to find that her son had shot up a movie theatre.

    This was a blatant lie by ABC, which has mangled coverage of this story on so many levels. ABC also showed the 2006 video of James Holmes speaking at a science camp, labelling the footage: “first video of a killer.” The number of media reports – mainstream and otherwise – that simply call Holmes “the killer” are too numerous to list.

  29. The MK-Ultra CIA mind-control tech looks like it was turned up to full capacity for this poor dude James Holmes by the odd color of his hair – having powerful frequencies zapped into your head might have an effect on your hair, its possible. We don’t know the effects of this technology.
    Who knows what secret technology these black ops people have. As Arthur.C.Clarke once said, future technology would seem impossible and indistinguishable from magic so since we know the CIA was messing around with mind-control technology way back in the 1950’s and 60’s, we can only imagine how advanced they’ve become in the last 50-60 years. One things for ABSOLUTE sure, they would never, ever allow for this kind of technology to become public knowledge. Its far too powerful a tool to let people know about because right now, anyone talking about mind-control is instantly considered as being a crazy fool so obviously it’s the perfect weapon for them, and I mean, the PERFECT weapon for them.

    I know some people will naturally find it hard to believe without seeing any first hand proof but you just need to open your mind to the possible. The CIA and Russia wouldn’t have been experimenting with this kind of technology if they didn’t think it was possible.
    For me, mind-control is by far the most logical and the most likely scenario for all of these lone gunmen going on killing spree’s in the last year or two. Each and every incident doesn’t make sense when you listen to the ‘official’ explanation. The most recent shooting was yesterday in a Connecticut school where 27 people were killed, 20 of which were children. I honestly can’t imagine any reason for such a senseless act and for this type of thing to keep happening over and over again, it just adds to my suspicion that these lone gunmen are not really responsible for their actions. With this recent shooting in Connecticut, the BBC initially reported eye-witnesses talking about multiple shooters, in fact, it was reported as an ORGANIZED group of people dressed as nuns. Then we had a media blackout of these eye-witnesses and it goes back to the usual lone gunman story. That’s a big difference going from an organized group of people dressed as nuns to a lone gunman – in my opinion, an organized group of nun’s is far too discriptive to be a mistake – its not something you could mistake a lone gunman for. I know if I saw a nun shooting guns, its not something I would be unsure about afterwards. This alone proves that the truth is being kept from us and theres more to this paticular story than they are telling us. Keeping secrets or telling lies for something as important as this tells me they cannot be trusted.

    So as I said, I can’t imagine any reason why a sane or even a crazy person would want to target children in this way, I certainly can’t imagine this happening over and over again in such a short period of time. This makes me question the official story and makes me wonder who actually benefits from these evil acts. Yes, that’s right, the GOVERNMENT do. The government who want to ban guns and remove more freedoms. Who else is possibly capable of such evil? Yes, that’s right, the GOVERNMENT is. Remember, we’re talking about the CIA who have absolutely no problem firing missiles from drones killing innocent women and children in Pakistan. The government/CIA are the only ones I can imagine who are capable of such horrors so I have no doubt in my mind that they are the real perpetrators behind these crimes.

    Once America has been disarmed, there is nothing the government has to fear anymore. I know for a fact there is politicians in America right now thinking that the lives of 20 children to disarm America would be for the ‘greater good’. I can just see them now, thinking and believing they are real patriots who are prepared to commit the necessary evil’s to ensure their governments survival. These people are sick, evil, monsters who have no emotion of empathy so they don’t feel the pain that we do. They are power hungry psychopaths who have been totally corrupted by their position of power.

    This is by far the most likely explanation I can come up with. Its an horrific thing to say but these brutal murders have been too convenient and too beneficial for the government to be a coincidence. The timing is perfect for them and because nobody is going to believe anyone who claims they are using mind-control technology, they’ve got nothing to worry about even if something does seem a little too convenient and coincidental. This is the attitude of these satanic monsters in positions of power,

    Either way, the truth is ugly and horrific but if its true, it means the people controlled to carry out these acts are just as much a victim as all the other people who died. People like James Holmes are just patsy’s who are being demonized by the media. Is it any wonder he looked so drugged and lost while in court, imagine if he was conscious of what he had been controlled to do, I know I would be in shock for the rest of my life if I was in his shoes.

    There’s more to these stories than they are telling us that’s for sure. I’m not asking you to believe it’s all mind-control but I am asking that you to at least keep an open mind to the possibility of it because the consequences of not exposing this if its real is too serious. Just remember who has benefited the most from these crimes and who we already know is capable of doing it. Now, at least go and research mind-control technology and hear what some of the victims of it have to say. We all owe it to the victims of these shootings to at least consider the possibilities and leave no stone unturned. I hope I’ve made my case.

    • James Holmes was sitting in his car drugged during the massacre. Adam and Nancy Lanza were shot in their home. Adam’s body was taken five miles to the school to be the patsy. Why would Adam go to the trouble of smashing all the home computers when he could have taken out the modem? An intruder wouldn’t know where the modem was or if the internet hookup was cable, telephone or satellite. The first thing the intruders would do, would be to confiscate the guns. It’s easier for the gov’t to carry out the massacre itself and set up patsies than to drug and hypnotize a shooter as in the case of Virginia Tech. There was also a caller to Coast to Coast who claimed his wife is a security adviser for the gov’t in D.C. She received a report of the CT shooting on her computer at work the day before it happened. What does all this tell us about our news sources? A couple months ago there was the nanny murders in Manhattan. Police Chief Ray Kelly would have us believe the nanny killed two young children and then tried to commit suicide by cutting her head off with a knife. An incredible team of NYC doctors were able to save her by inducing a coma while stabilizing her. Come on, people! Wake up ! Welcome to the Age of Enlightenment. We don’t have to play dumb just because the gov’t wants us to.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s